I have to confess to a near obsession with our current
presidential election and all of the political maneuvering that has been
involved. Perhaps it is because of the historic nature of the two tickets
or the implications of this election in such nationally and internationally
perilous times. No matter who is elected, we are about to make history! As
pastor of FaithBridge, I believe it is my
responsibility to call upon the church to have a Biblically based view of both
politics and our role in those politics.
It is important that we first have an appropriate view of
the State in order to best understand how we should relate and respond.
Since we all have a personal, civic and spiritual responsibility to get
involved and to cast our vote we need to make sure our beliefs and
expectations are consistent with God's Word. God established three human institutions: the
home (Gen. 2:18–25), government (Gen. 9:1–17), and the church (Acts 2). The
question for this blog is:
What should be our view of
the government and why does it exist in the first place?
FIRST, government is a God-ordained institution
(Gen. 9:6; Daniel 4:17, 25; Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2:13-17) and this is true of
all human political entities. God puts
those people in the positions of authority that they hold and will work His
sovereign will through them as He decides ... whether that is with their
cooperation or not. While the government of the United
States is not the God-led government of Old Testament Israel (Theocracy), our government is still obligated to operate according to God’s
laws and in service to God’s interests.
Psalm 9:7 records the consequences of ignoring that obligation when it
says, the wicked return to the grave, all
the nations that forget God.
SECOND, government occupies
an important place in human social order. Because man is essentially
wicked (Jeremiah 17:9), and when left to himself will serve selfish interests,
a political institution is a moral and practical necessity (Gen 9:6). The Bible teaches that man has a moral
responsibility to God and others so our government should affirm and support
those moral responsibilities. The
problems start when God’s moral standard is rejected or minimized as just an
alternative.
THIRD, our obligation to
submit to our government has its limits. Jesus said, give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God
what is God's (Mark 12:17). In doing
so, he acknowledged there is an appropriate submission to governmental
authority. However, the first century disciples offer a good example of the
limits of our obligation. When they were
on trial, the court officials said to them, “we gave you strict orders not to teach in this name … yet you have
filled Jerusalem
with your teaching and are determined to make us guilty of this man's blood.” To
this, Peter and the other apostles replied:
"We must obey God rather than men! (Acts 5:28-29). For Christians, obligation to submit to
governmental authority should be held in tension with the personal
responsibilities we each have toward God, our families and the church.
FOURTH, our government has a
limited scope of responsibility for our lives. There are reasonable
limits of the obedience which we are to offer to the government because it has
a limited responsibility for our lives. It
is neither responsible for all aspects of our lives (Totalitarianism) nor should
it be absent altogether (Anarchy). God
himself intends to be our source of strength, hope and provision … not our
government. We should not expect the
government to create an ideal society.
Rather, its function is largely to restrain the wickedness of individual
members of that society from abusing the freedoms of others (Romans 13:4-5). Specifically:
- Administer
justice (Jeremiah 23:5; Amos 5:15)
- Protect
the poor and weak from the rich and powerful (Isaiah 3:13-14; Amos 2:6;
5:12)
- Protect
the innocent (Romans 13:3)
- Promote
equality in application of the Law (Acts 10:34; Exodus 23:6)
- Protect
the whole from hostile invasion (2 Chronicles 26:9-15)
Responsibility for building a particular quality of life is
the responsibility of the individual in relation to God (and of God’s people to
care for those who are without). Socialism and its offspring have an unlimited view of human ability and morality (Humanism); it charges government with the responsibility to engineer an ideal society ... its religious twin (Liberation Theology) teaches that, in essence, Jesus came and died for us to have a better quality of life here and now. Government cannot change people’s hearts and we should not expect it to play a role that only God can play. The
children of Israel
made this mistake when they rejected God’s rule over them and asked for a King
“like all the other nations.” Check out
what happened in 1 Samuel 8:10-18.
Next, let’s look at the idea
of what constitutes “Christian politics” …
Posted on
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
by Paul White